2009 Investment Climate Statement - Ireland
The Irish Government actively promotes foreign direct investment (FDI), a strategy that has fueled robust economic growth since the "Celtic Tiger" period of the late 1990s. Ireland’s pro-investment climate saw total FDI stock grow from Euro 53 billion in 1998 to €131 billion in 2007. Traditionally, the principal goal of investment promotion has been employment creation, especially in technology-intensive and high-skill industries. More recently, the Government has focused on Ireland’s international competitiveness by encouraging foreign-invested companies to enhance research and development (R&D) activities and to deliver higher-value goods and services.
The Irish Government's actions have had considerable success in attracting U.S. investment. In 2008, the U.S. investment stock in Ireland, a country of just over 4 million, was worth USD 87 billion. According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), in 2007, U.S. investment flows into Ireland reached USD 14.5 billion. Of this, about one-half (USD 7.1 billion) came from the information and scientific, professional and technical services sectors. There are over 600 U.S. firms in Ireland, directly employing approximately 100,000 workers and supporting work for another 250,000, out of a total labor force of about 2 million people. U.S. firms operate primarily in the following sectors: chemicals; bio-pharmaceuticals and medical devices; computer hardware and software; electronics; and, financial services. Ireland has become a magnet for U.S. internet/digital media investment, with industry leaders Yahoo, Google, and Amazon making Dublin the hub of their respective European operations.
U.S. companies are attracted to Ireland as an export platform to the EU. In 2006, Irish-based U.S. firms exported roughly USD 57 billion worth of goods and services, mostly destined for the EU market. Other reasons for Ireland’s attractiveness as an FDI destination include: a 12.5 percent corporate tax rate for domestic and foreign firms; the quality and flexibility of the English-speaking work force; cooperative labor relations; political stability; pro-business government policies; a transparent judicial system; and, the pulling power of existing companies operating successfully in Ireland (a "clustering" effect). Factors that negatively affect Ireland’s ability to attract investment include: increasing labor costs, skilled labor shortages, inadequate infrastructure (such as in the transportation and internet/broadband sectors), and absolute price levels that are among the highest in Europe. The Irish government has become more concerned about the possibility of rising energy costs and the reliability of energy supply undermining Ireland’s attractiveness as an FDI destination.
Four state organizations promote inward investment into Ireland by foreign companies:
- The Industrial Development Authority of Ireland (IDA Ireland) has overall responsibility for promoting and facilitating FDI in all areas of the country, except the Shannon Free Zone. IDA Ireland is also responsible for attracting foreign companies to Dublin's International Financial Services Center (IFSC). IDA Ireland maintains offices in New York, Chicago, San Jose, and Atlanta, as well as in Europe and Asia;
- Enterprise Ireland promotes joint ventures and strategic alliances between indigenous and foreign companies. The agency also assists foreign firms that wish to establish food and drink manufacturing operations in Ireland;
- Shannon Free Airport Development Co. (SFADCO), or “Shannon Development,” handles FDI in the Shannon Free Zone (see para 61) and owns properties in the Shannon region as potential investment greenfield sites. Under the 2006 Industrial Development Amendments Act, responsibility for investment by Irish firms in the Shannon region transferred from Shannon Development to Enterprise Ireland. The IDA remains responsible for FDI in the Shannon region outside the Shannon Free Zone;
- Udaras na Gaeltachta has responsibility for economic development in those areas of Ireland where Irish (Gaelic) is the predominant language, and works with IDA Ireland to promote overseas investment in these regions.
Ireland's judicial system is transparent and upholds the sanctity of contracts as well as laws affecting foreign investment. These laws include:
- The Industrial Development Act of 1993, which outlines the functions of IDA Ireland;
- The Mergers, Takeovers and Monopolies Control Act of 1978, which sets out rules governing mergers and takeovers by foreign and domestic companies;
- The Competition (Amendment) Act of 1996, which amends and extends the Competition Act of 1991 and the Mergers and Takeovers (Control) Acts of 1978 and 1987, and sets out the rules governing competitive behavior;
- The Companies Act of 1963, which contains the basic requirements for incorporation in Ireland (amended in 1990); and,
- The 2004 Finance Act, which introduced tax incentives to encourage firms to set up headquarters in Ireland and to conduct R&D. Further, the government of Ireland intends to enhance R&D incentives during 2009.
One of Ireland's most attractive features as an FDI destination is the low corporate tax rate. Since January 1, 2003, the corporate tax rate for both foreign and domestic firms has been 12.5 percent. Foreign firms that established an Irish presence prior to this date retain their entitlement to the "old" 10 percent rate until 2010 in the case of manufacturing and certain internationally traded services. Ireland's corporate tax rate is among the lowest in the EU, and the Irish Government continues to oppose proposals not only to harmonize taxes at a single EU rate, but also to standardize the accounting methods used by EU Member States to calculate corporate taxes.
All firms incorporated in Ireland are treated on an equal basis. With only a few exceptions, there are no constraints preventing foreign individuals or entities from ownership or participation in private firms/corporations. The most significant of these exceptions was eliminated on September 24, 2008 by EU Regulation 1008/2008, which did away with the requirement that Irish airlines (and those from other EU countries) must be at least 50 percent-owned by EU residents in order to have full access to the single European aviation market. There are also requirements related to the purchase of agricultural lands (see para 9).
While Ireland does not have a formal privatization program, the Government in September 2005 privatized the state-owned national airline, Aer Lingus, through a stock market flotation that valued the carrier at euro 1.2 billion. The Government retains about a one-quarter stake in the airline. There are no barriers to participation by foreign institutions in the sale of Irish state-owned companies, as evident in the purchase of Aer Lingus shares by U.S. investors. Residents of Ireland, however, may be given priority in share allocations to retail investors, as was the case with the state-owned telecommunications company, Eircom, privatized in 1998.
Citizens of countries other than Ireland and other EU member states can acquire land for private residential purposes and for industrial purposes. Under Section 45 of the Land Act, 1965, all non-EU nationals must obtain the written consent of the Land Commission before acquiring an interest in agricultural land, though there are many stud farms and racing facilities in Ireland that are owned by foreign nationals. There are no restrictions on the acquisition of urban land.
There is no formal screening process for foreign investment in Ireland, though investors looking to receive Government grants or assistance through one of the four state agencies responsible for promoting foreign investment in Ireland are often required to meet certain employment and investment criteria (see section "D"). These screening mechanisms are transparent and do not impede investment, limit competition, or protect domestic interests. Potential investors are also required to examine the environmental impact of the proposed project and to meet with Irish Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) officials.
Conversion and Transfer Policies
Ireland uses the Euro as its national currency and enjoys full current and capital account liberalization. There are no restrictions or reported significant delays in the conversion or repatriation of investment capital, earnings, interest, or royalties, nor are there any plans to change remittance policies. Likewise, there are no limitations on the import of capital into Ireland. Foreign exchange is easily obtainable at market rates.
Expropriation and Compensation
Private property is normally expropriated only for public purposes in a non-discriminatory manner and in accordance with established principles of international law. State condemnations of private property are carried out in accordance with recognized principles of due process. Where there are disputes between owners of private property subject to a government taking, the Irish courts provide a system of judicial review and appeal.
The only recent case of expropriatory action involved a dispute over the disposition of the ownership rights to the Lusitania, the ship that was sunk off Ireland’s southern coast in 1915 by a German submarine and which is owned by a U.S. citizen. In 2001, the U.S. owner brought action against the Government in the Irish courts after his applications for a license to dive to the vessel were denied. In 2005, a High Court ruling in the case noted that “the State simply cannot directly or indirectly expropriate this property from (the owner), or totally, or even substantially deny him access to or the use of his property or any part or parts of his property, even under color of merely regulating that access or use for the purpose of safeguarding a national asset, without paying appropriate compensation.” In March 2007, the Irish Supreme Court ruled in favor of the U.S. citizen owner.
Ireland has no specific domestic laws governing investment disputes with foreign firms. There is, however, a legal arbitration framework available to parties that opt to arbitrate a dispute, including investment disputes, rather than litigate the case. Currently, there are no disputes involving investments by U.S. firms either in arbitration or litigation. In recent years, however, U.S. business representatives have occasionally called into question the transparency of government tenders, some of which have been won by U.S. companies. According to some U.S. firms, lengthy budgetary decisions delay procurements, and the Government sometimes identifies preferred bidders before making a tender decision. Some U.S. firms also claim that unsuccessful bidders have had difficulty receiving information on the rationale behind the tender outcome. Conversely, successful bidders have experienced delays in finalizing contracts, commencing work on major projects, obtaining accurate project data, and receiving compensation for work completed, including through conciliation and arbitration processes. Successful bidders have also subsequently found that the original tenders do not accurately describe conditions on the ground.
The Irish legal system is based on common law, legislation and the Constitution. The Companies Act 1963 (amended 1990) is the most important body of law dealing with commercial and bankruptcy law and is applied consistently by the courts. Irish bankruptcy laws give creditors a strong degree of protection. The Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment is the state agency with primary responsibility for drafting and enforcing company law. The judiciary is independent, and litigants are entitled to trial by jury in commercial disputes. Ireland is a member of the International Center for the Settlement of Investment Disputes, and the Irish Government has been willing to agree to binding international arbitration of investment disputes between foreign investors and the state. Ireland is also a party to the New York Convention of 1958 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. There is no specific domestic body for handling investment disputes.
Performance Requirements and Incentives
The Irish Government does not maintain any measures that it has notified the WTO to be inconsistent with Trade-Related Investment Measures (TRIMs) requirements. Moreover, there have been no allegations that the Government maintains measures that violate the WTO's TRIMs text.
Three Irish organizations, SFADCO, IDA Ireland, and Udaras, have regulatory authority for administering grant aid to investors for capital equipment, land, buildings, training, R&D, etc. Foreign and domestic business enterprises that seek grant aid from these organizations must submit investment proposals. Typically, these proposals include information on fixed assets (capital), labor, and technology/R&D components and establish targets using criteria such as sales, profitability, exports, and employment. This information is treated in confidence by the organizations, and each investment proposal is subject to an economic appraisal prior to approval for support. In 2007, IDA Ireland paid out Euro 78.5 million in grants to foreign firms, as compared to Euro 96.6 million in 2006.
Performance requirements are generally based on employment creation targets established between the state investment agencies and foreign investors. Grant aid is paid out only after externally audited performance targets have been attained. Generally, parent companies must guarantee repayment of the government grant if the company closes before an agreed period of time elapses, normally ten years after the grant has been paid. Grant agreements generally have a term of five years after the date on which the last grant is paid. There are no requirements that foreign investors purchase from local sources or allow nationals to own shares.
EU Regional Aid Guidelines (RAG) that apply to Ireland were announced in 2006 and became effective on January 1, 2007. The RAG govern the amount of grant aid that the Irish Government can provide to companies, depending on their location. The differences in the aid ceilings noted in the chart below reflect the less developed status of business/infrastructure in regions outside the greater Dublin area. For the period 2007-2008, the following ceilings apply:
Maximum Grant % Allowed
(EE = eligible expenditure)
- Border, Midlands, West
30% on first euro 50 million of EE
15% on next euro 50 million of EE
10.2% of balance above euro 100 million of EE
- South East, Mid West, and South West
10% on first euro 50 million of EE
5% on next euro 50 million of EE
3.4% of balance above euro 100 million of EE
There are no restrictions, de jure or de facto, on participation by foreign firms in government-financed and/or subsidized R&D programs on a national basis. In fact, the government strongly encourages foreign companies to conduct R&D as part of a national strategy to build a more knowledge-intensive, innovation-based economy. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI), the state science agency, was responsible for administering a Euro 365 million R&D fund under the 2000-2006 National Development Plan. The 2007-2013 National Development Plan envisions a significant ramp-up in such funding. The fund has targeted leading researchers in Ireland and overseas to promote within Ireland the development of biotechnology and information/communications technology, as well as complementary worker skills. Under the 2004 Finance Act, moreover, a credit of 20 percent of the incremental expenditure on revenue items, royalties, plant, and machinery related to R&D can be offset against a company's corporation tax liability in the year in which it is incurred. In 2008, IDA Ireland supported 56 R&D investment projects, involving a planned total investment of €420 million. Investments included: a €50 million R&D investment at Boston Scientific in Galway; Oriflame Cosmetics’ €2.4 million investment in Co. Wicklow; and the DePuy part of the Johnson & Johnson family decision to locate its new innovation centre in Cork with 20 new jobs. Announcements in 2008 in ICT included a €29 million R&D investment in Dublin by Business Objects, an expansion by Synopsis, the world leader in providing software and intellectual property products, of its R&D operation in Dublin, and EMC’s €20 million investment in R&D activities.
In addition to the new RAGs, a new EU framework for research, development, and innovation (RD&I) for the 2007-2013 period has also come into force. The framework is geared toward achieving the objectives of the Lisbon Agenda, and grant support is available throughout all regions of Ireland. The table below shows grant rates for each category of eligible RD&I.
|Type of Research||Grant %|
|-“Fundamental” (activity designed |
to broaden scientific and
technical knowledge not linked
to industrial or commercial objectives)
|-“Industrial” (planned research |
of critical investigation aimed
at the acquisition of new knowledge,
the objective being that such knowledge
may be useful in developing new products,
processes or services or in bringing
about a significant improvement in existing
products, processes or services)
|-“Experimental” (shaping of the results |
of industrial research into a plan of
design for new, altered or improved
products, processes or services, whether
they are intended to be sold or used,
including the creation of an initial
prototype which could not be used
Right to Private Ownership and Establishment
The most common form of business organization in Ireland is the incorporated company, limited by shares, registered under the Companies Act, 1963, or previous legislation. Irish law does not prevent foreign corporations from carrying on business in Ireland. Any company incorporated abroad that establishes a branch must, however, file certain papers with the Registrar of Companies. A foreign corporation with a branch in Ireland will have the same standing in Irish law for purposes of contracts, etc., as a company incorporated in Ireland. Private businesses are not at a competitive disadvantage to public enterprises with respect to access to markets, credit, and other business operations.
Before 1999, Irish company law differed from international norms by allowing, for tax purposes, the registration of companies in Ireland that were not actually resident in Ireland (so-called Irish Registered Non-Resident companies (IRNRs)). In response to concern that a large number of the estimated 40,000 IRNRs were engaged in fraud, tax evasion, money laundering, and other illegal activities, the 1999 Finance Act equated registration in Ireland with tax residence and liability for all companies except in limited circumstances. Exceptions include cases where the Irish company, or a related parent company, is carrying on trade in Ireland, and the company is ultimately controlled either by residents of an EU member state or by residents of a country with which Ireland has a tax treaty (including the United States). Nonetheless, all Irish-based companies, including U.S. firms, claiming non-residence in Ireland because of tax treaty provisions must identify the beneficial owners of the company.
Similarly, the "Companies (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 1999" requires that every application for company registration in Ireland show the manner in which the proposed company will carry out activities in Ireland. Section 43 of the legislation stipulates that a company must either have a director resident in the State or provide a bond in the event that the company commits an offense under the Companies Act or tax legislation. Section 44 states that these requirements may be waived when the Company obtains a certificate from the Companies Office stating that the company has a real and continuous link with one or more economic activities in Ireland. Like the 1999 Finance Act, the Companies Act is designed to prevent the use of IRNRs for exclusively foreign activities without any connection to Ireland.
Protection of Property Rights
(I) Real Property
Secured interests in property, both chattel and real estate, are recognized and enforced. The Department of Justice administers a reliable system of recording such security interests through the Land Registry and Registry of Deeds. An efficient, non-discriminatory legal system is accessible to foreign investors to protect and facilitate acquisition and disposition of all property rights.
(II) Intellectual Property Rights
Ireland is a member of the World Intellectual Property Organization and a party to the International Convention for the Protection of Intellectual Property. In July 2000, Irish President Mary McAleese signed legislation bringing Irish intellectual property rights (IPR) law into compliance with Ireland's obligations under the WTO Trade-Related Intellectual Property Treaty (TRIPs). The legislation came into force on January 1, 2001, and gives Ireland one of the most comprehensive legal frameworks for IPR protection in Europe.
This legislation addressed several TRIPs inconsistencies in previous Irish IPR law that had concerned foreign investors, including the absence of a rental right for sound recordings, the lack of an "anti-bootlegging" provision, and low criminal penalties that failed to deter piracy. The legislation provides for stronger penalties on both the civil and criminal sides, but does not include minimum mandatory sentencing for IPR violations.
As part of this comprehensive copyright legislation, changes were also made to revise the non-TRIPs conforming sections of Irish patent law. Specifically, the IPR legislation addresses two concerns of many foreign investors in the previous legislation:
- the compulsory licensing provisions of the previous 1992 Patent Law were inconsistent with the "working" requirement prohibition of TRIPs Articles 27.1 and the general compulsory licensing provisions of Article 31; and,
- applications processed after December 20, 1991, did not conform to the non-discrimination requirement of TRIPs Article 27.1.
Transparency of Regulatory System
The Irish Government generally employs a transparent and effective policy framework that fosters competition between private businesses in a non-discriminatory fashion. While ongoing Irish judicial "tribunals" are investigating possible links between indigenous Irish companies' political donations in the late 1980s and favorable government decisions, U.S. businesses can, in general, expect to receive national treatment in their dealings with the Government. There is no report of any U.S. firm or investor having being required or forced to make payments during that period.
In recent years, independent bodies have taken over regulatory powers from Cabinet Departments in key economic sectors. The Commission for Communications Regulation and the Commission for Energy Regulation are responsible for regulating the communications and energy sectors, respectively. Both are independent bodies with institutional links to the Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources. The Commission for Aviation Regulation is an independent body that regulates the aviation sector. It is institutionally linked to the Department of Transport, which has direct regulatory powers over other segments of the transportation sector.
The Competition (Amendment) Act 1996 amends and extends the Competition Act 1991, strengthens the enforcement power of the Competition Authority, introduces criminal liability, increases corporate liability, and outlines available defenses. Most tax, labor, environment, health and safety, and other laws are compatible with European Union regulations, and they do not adversely affect investment. Proposed laws and regulations are published in draft form for public comment, including by foreign firms and their representative associations. Bureaucratic procedures are transparent and reasonably efficient, in line with a general pro-business climate espoused by the Government.
Efficient Capital Markets and Portfolio Investment
Capital markets and portfolio investments operate freely, and there is no discrimination between Irish and foreign firms. In some instances, development authorities and banks are able to facilitate loan packages to foreign firms with favorable credit terms. Credit is allocated on market terms, although the Irish Competition Authority found in 2004 that the banking sector's lack of competition limited the amount of credit available to small and medium-sized firms. Irish legal, regulatory, and accounting systems are transparent and consistent with international norms and provide a secure environment for portfolio investment. The capital gains tax rate is 20 percent.
In late 2008, the Irish banking system began to buckle under the combined weight of the global economic downturn and the collapse in the Irish property market. The loan book of the leading banks is heavily weighted toward property and house prices have fallen significantly in 2008 – in some places by as much as 30 – 40 percent. The banks, as a result, have required significant government support. In September 2008, the Irish government announced that it would guarantee all deposits at the six leading Irish banks. This offer was extended to foreign-domiciled banks with a “significant” presence in Ireland but none of these institutions took part in the guarantee. In December 2008, the government announced that it would provide up to USD 10 billion in new capital to the three largest banks – Allied Irish Bank (AIB), Bank of Ireland, and Anglo Irish Bank. As of January 2009, the plan to transfer the funds had not yet been put in place. The chief of the financial regulator announced his retirement following the revelation that the former Anglo Irish Bank chairman had improperly transferred funds out of the bank over a period of several years in an attempt to conceal the true state of the bank’s books.
The estimated total assets of all licensed credit institutions at the end of November 2008 was approximately €1.4 trillion, with the Bank of Ireland and Allied Irish Banks holding a combined 25 percent of total assets. U.S. banks operating in Ireland include Citigroup and Chase Manhattan.
As of end-December 2008, equity market capitalization in the Irish Stock Exchange (ISE) was €31.3 billion, down from an end-2007 figure of €90.4 billion. In terms of market weight, the stocks of four companies are predominant: Allied Irish Bank, Bank of Ireland, CRH (a construction industry supplier), Elan (a pharmaceuticals firm), Aer Lingus, and Ryanair. Until 2007, the Irish stock market had seen a steady recovery since plummeting in 2002 following the global economic slowdown and management problems at several major Irish companies. From 2002 to 2006, ISE delivered returns of between 19 and 28 percent each year. However, driven in part by concerns over possible spillover from the sub-prime crisis in the United States, the market capitalization fell by almost nine percent through the first 11 months of 2007 and, as can be seen from the numbers above, the market cap at the end of 2008 was 1/3 of what it was at the end of 2007. In 2005, ISEQ opened up a secondary market, the Irish Enterprise Exchange (IEX), which caters to smaller firms with a minimum market cap of euro 5 million.
In May 2003, the Central Bank of Ireland was reorganized into the Central Bank and Financial Services Authority of Ireland (CBFSAI), in accord with the Central Bank and Financial Services Authority of Ireland Act 2003. Under the legislation, the Governor of the CBFSAI has responsibility for the overall stability of the Irish financial system. The legislation also established the Irish Financial Services Regulatory Authority (IFSRA), which is an autonomous but constituent part of CBFSAI that regulates financial services institutions in Ireland and, since 2006, the Irish Stock Exchange. IFSRA took over this responsibility from a mix of government bodies, including: the Central Bank, the Department of Trade, Enterprise, and Employment (DETE), the Office of Director of Consumer Affairs, and Registrar of Friendly Societies. The legislation also enhanced the regulatory powers given to IFSRA, particularly in consumer protection.
The Central Bank is a member of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB), whose primary objective is to maintain price stability in the euro area. Ireland no longer operates an independent monetary policy. Rather, ESCB formulates and implements monetary policy for the euro-zone, and the Central Bank implements that policy at the national level. The Governor of the Central Bank is one of 18 members of the Governing Council for the ECB and has an equal say in the formulation of monetary and interest rate policy. The other main tasks of the Central Bank include: issuing euro currency in Ireland; acting as manager of the official external reserves of gold and foreign currency; conducting research and analysis on economic and financial matters; overseeing the domestic payment and settlement systems; and, managing investment assets on behalf of the State.
The Irish Takeover Panel Act of 1997 governs company takeovers. Under the Act, the “Takeover Panel” issues guidelines, or "Takeover Rules," which aim to regulate commercial behaviour in the context of mergers and takeovers. According to minority squeeze-out provisions in the legislation, a bidder who holds 80 percent of the shares of the target company can compel the remaining minority shareholders to sell their shares. There are no reports that the legislation has been used to prevent foreign takeovers specifically, and, in fact, there have been several high-profile foreign takeovers of Irish companies in the banking and telecommunications sectors in recent years. In 2006, for example, the Australian investment group, Babcock & Brown, acquired the former national telephone company, Eircom. The EU Directive on Takeovers provides a framework of common principles for cross-border takeover bids, creates a level playing field for shareholders, and establishes disclosure obligations throughout the EU. The Directive was implemented through Irish legislation in May 2006, though many of its principles had already been enacted in the Irish Takeover Panel Act 1997.
(I) Impact of Northern Ireland Instability
The growth of business investment and confidence in Northern Ireland following the cessation of widespread violence has benefited the Republic of Ireland. In 2006, the Irish and British Governments launched a report on potential areas for cross-border economic cooperation, such as R&D collaboration, energy and transportation infrastructure linkages, and joint trade missions. The 2007-2013 National Development Plan earmarks funding to develop these linkages. No violence related to the situation in Northern Ireland has been specifically directed at U.S. citizens or firms located in the South.
The 1998 ratification of the Good Friday Agreement by large majorities in both Ireland and Northern Ireland further diminished the potential for violence. Although groups in Northern Ireland opposed to the peace process have continued to commit infrequent acts of criminality, there have been no serious incidents in the Republic of Ireland. In May 2007, the Northern Ireland Assembly was restored and local government resumed; a key landmark in the successful peace process in Northern Ireland that commenced with the Good Friday Agreement. In November 2008, Sinn Fein and the Democratic Unionist Party, former combatants, announced they had struck a deal to devolve policing and justice functions from national control to the Northern Ireland Assembly. This resolved the last major political hurdle to full resumption of normal local government in Northern Ireland and represented significant maturation of the Northern Ireland peace process.
(II) Other Acts of Political Violence
On September 16, 2008 a bomb was found outside of the Dublin offices of Royal Dutch Shell. Shell is developing an offshore gas field off the coast of Mayo. Part of the project involves laying an on-shore pipeline to connect the field to the national gas grid. This work has been opposed by a vocal minority in the local community. The protests have been mainly confined to the area around the site for the pipeline. In 2003, several Irish citizens opposed to the Iraq War damaged U.S. military assets at Shannon Airport. In 2004, one of these citizens was convicted in an Irish court and given a suspended sentence. In late 2005, a group of opposition and independent Irish parliamentarians said publicly that they would not oppose further attacks on U.S. military aircraft transiting Ireland. In 2006, five other Irish citizens involved in the damage of U.S. military assets in 2003 were acquitted by a jury decision in an Irish court. The jury accepted arguments by the defendants, the so-called “Shannon Five,” that they had acted to prevent loss of life and property damage in Iraq.
Corruption is not a serious problem for foreign investors in Ireland. The principal Irish legislation relating to anti-bribery and corruption includes the Public Bodies Corrupt Practices Act 1889, the Prevention of Corruption Act 1906, the Prevention of Corruption Act 1916, and the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act 2001. This body of law makes it illegal for Irish public servants to accept bribes. The Ethics in Public Office Act 1995 provides for the written annual disclosure of interests of people holding public office or employment.
Ireland signed the UN Convention on Corruption in December 2003, and ratification is pending a review of the legal measures required for implementation. In January 2000, the GOI introduced to Parliament the "Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2001," to ratify and implement the OECD Convention on Bribery. The legislation, which enabled Ireland to ratify a number of conventions dealing with corruption drawn up by the European Union, the Council of Europe, and the OECD, came fully into force as law in November 2002. Ireland formally ratified the OECD Convention in September 2003. Ireland is also a member of the OECD Working Group on Bribery and the Group of States Against Corruption (GRECO). Under the Prevention of Corruption Act, the bribery of foreign officials is a criminal offense. Bribery of foreign officials may also invalidate a contract that a party is seeking to enforce in Ireland.
A number of ongoing judicial tribunals are seeking to establish whether political donations by certain Irish companies in the late 1980s and early 1990s can be linked to favorable government decisions, mostly at the local level, in zoning and tax matters. There is also media and public concern that business interests may have compromised Irish politics in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Despite these reports of payments to political parties and figures in the 1980s and early 1990s, there remains no indication that foreign businesses or investors have had to make such payments or been approached to make such payments to conduct business during the period in question or in years since.
In 2006, the Irish media disclosed information leaked from the Mahon Tribunal that Prime Minister (Taoiseach) Bertie Ahern had, as Finance Minister in the 1990s, accepted the equivalent of roughly €50,000 in loans from associates. Following the disclosure, the Prime Minister made public statements about the incident, noting that his actions had not been illegal and that political favors had been neither sought nor granted in connection with the loans. The Mahon Tribunal continued to meet on occasion in 2007 and 2008 without reaching any determination. Its deliberations will continue in 2009. Prime Minister Ahern resigned in May 2008, stating, in part, that the Mahon Tribunal investigation was distracting the government from its business. In 2006, the Moriarty Tribunal found that former Prime Minister Charles Haughey had accepted the equivalent of roughly euro 12 million in payments between 1979 and 1996 in return for political favors, such as tax reductions for associates and the procurement of a passport. Haughey died in 2006.
The Irish police investigate allegations of corruption. If sufficient evidence of criminal activity is found, the Director of Public Prosecutions prepares a file for prosecution. A small number of public officials have been convicted of corruption and/or bribery in the past.
Bilateral Investment Agreements
Ireland's only bilateral investment protection agreement is with the Czech Republic. In addition, Ireland has bilateral tax treaties with a wide range of countries, most importantly with the United States and the U.K. These agreements serve to promote trade and investment between Ireland and the partner countries that would otherwise be discouraged by the possibility of double taxation. In the absence of a bilateral tax treaty, provisions within the Irish Taxes Act allow unilateral credit relief against Irish tax for tax paid in the other country in respect of certain types of income, e.g., dividends and interest.
OPIC and Other Investment Insurance Programs
Since 1986 the U.S. Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) has been authorized to operate in Ireland as part of the U.S. effort to support the process of peace and reconciliation in Northern Ireland. There is some potential in Ireland for OPIC's credit guarantee programs, such as in regard to aircraft purchases. No other countries have an investment insurance program in Ireland. Ireland is a member of the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA).
In 2008, the economy fell into recession resulting in a fall in the level of employment. levels in Ireland reached historical highs, the result of continued strong economic growth. As of May 2008 (the latest available official figures), the number of persons employed was roughly 2.1 million, unchanged year-on-year. However, the job losses began to hit after May and the end-December 2008 unemployment rate figure stood at 8.3 percent. Those claiming some type of unemployment benefit jumped to 293,500 people in December 2008 from 172,400 at the same time one year ago. Between 1994 and the middle of 2008, employment growth averaged over 4.0 percent, with lower rates recorded in 2002 and 2003 following the post 9/11 global economic slowdown. Prior to the labor market contraction in mid-2008, Ireland had one of the lowest unemployment rates among EU Member States at roughly half the EU average. Local economists are predicting that the rate of unemployment may reach as high as 12 percent in 2009. There is a worry that unemployment among the young will be significantly higher and that this may have broader implications, especially with regard to criminal activity. Recent immigrants to Ireland, principally from Poland and the Baltic countries, are beginning to leave Ireland in search of work elsewhere in the EU. This has alleviated some of the downward pressure on wages but the harder issue to fix is labor demand, which is falling due to the contraction of the Irish economy. In spite of the labor market turmoil, the focus of government strategy continues to be on upgrading skills and increasing the number of workers in technology-intensive, high-value sectors.
Irish labor force regulation is less restrictive compared with most continental EU countries. The Irish workforce is characterized by a high degree of flexibility, mobility, and education. There is a relative gender balance in the workforce, with 1.162 million males and 850,700 females employed as of end 2007 (there is no official data for 2008 yet). This gender balance reflects a change in social mores that has facilitated a surge in female employment since the mid-1980s
Until 2008, wages remain on an upward growth curve. As of the end of the 2nd quarter 2008 (the latest available official data), average industrial earnings per worker were €641 per week, a 2.1 percent increase year-on-year. Between 1998 and 2003, compensation per employee increased by 37.1 percent, compared to an increase of 8.7 percent in Germany over the same period. The minimum wage was €5.20 when it was first introduced in 2000 and rose to €8.65 in July 2007.
Unprecedented inward migration levels, particularly from Eastern Europe, have added a new dynamic to the Irish labor market. For example, of the 83,000 new workers added to the labor force between the third quarters of 2005 and 2006, roughly 40,500 were non-Irish nationals, working mostly in the construction and lower-end services sectors. According to Ireland’s Central Statistical Office (CSO), the number of non-nationals residing in Ireland has more than doubled between since 2002 to roughly 420,000, or roughly 10 percent of the total population. Irish labor unions and Labor Party politicians have expressed concern over the possibility of displacement of Irish workers by non-nationals. Until the 2008 economic slowdown, however, yearly job creation in Ireland was sufficient to accommodate both Irish and non-Irish workers and that there was no evidence of downward pressure on wages. However, with the slowdown, anecdotal evidence suggests that Ireland is experiencing job losses rather than net job creation for this first time in more than a decade.
The Irish system of industrial relations is a voluntary one. Pay levels and conditions of employment are generally agreed through collective bargaining between employers and employees. Since 1987, collective bargaining has taken place under the framework of a series of national economic programs, negotiated by representatives of employers, trade unions, farmers, and the government. Over the years, employers have generally implemented the benchmarks for pay and employee benefits established by the national economic programs, even thought the benchmarks do not have legal force. This consensual "Social Partnership" approach has been a major factor in improving the industrial relations climate since the mid-1980s. In 2007, the number of working days lost as a result of industrial disputes was 6,038, as compared to 130,000 in 1995.
In September 2006, Ireland’s major unions and the employers’ representative body agreed to the latest national economic program, "Toward 2016," under the Social Partnership framework. The agreement followed a nine-month negotiation that centered on the increasingly significant role of foreign workers in the Irish economy. The national economic program sets out consensus positions on wide-ranging social policies over a 10-year period and includes a 10-percent pay increase for workers over the first 3 years. The package encompasses measures to protect employment standards, such as the establishment of a new agency (the Office of the Director of Employment Rights Compliance), a tripling of the Labor Inspectorate, and tougher penalties for employers who exploit foreign workers. The deal also calls on the Government to engage with unions and employers in drawing up a comprehensive policy on pensions. In response to the economic slowdown, the social partners in late 2008 agreed to an 18-month “transition” agreement that contained an accord on wage hikes. As of January 2009, it looks likely that this deal will be amended to roll back the agreed-to wage increases.
Employers typically resist trade union demands for mandatory trade union recognition in the workplace. While the Irish constitution guarantees the right of citizens to form associations and unions, Irish law also affirms the right of employers not to recognize unions and to deal with employees on an individual basis. Currently, roughly 33 percent of workers in the private sector are unionized, compared to 95 percent in the public sector. Among foreign-owned firms, roughly 80 percent of workers do not belong to unions, although pay and benefits are usually more attractive compared with domestic firms.
Foreign-Trade Zones/Free Ports
The Shannon duty-free Processing Zone (SDFPZ) was established by legislation in 1957. Under the legislation, eligible companies operating in the Shannon Free Zone are entitled to the following benefits: goods imported from non-EU countries for storage, handling or processing are duty-free; no duty on goods exported from Shannon to non-EU countries; no time limit on disposal of goods held duty-free; minimum customs documentation and formalities; no Value Added Tax (VAT) on imported goods, including capital equipment; choice of having import duty on non-EU product calculated on its landing value or selling-out price. Qualifying criteria for eligible companies include employment creation and export-orientation. Foreign-owned firms in the Shannon Free Zone have the same investment opportunities as indigenous Irish companies. At the end of 2008, there were about 100 foreign manufacturing and service companies established in the Shannon Free Zone, employing roughly 7,000 workers. Also in 2007, trade from the Shannon Free Zone amounted to €3.3 billion. U.S. companies, which make up 57 percent of the firms operating out of Shannon, include GE Capital, Bristol Myers Squibb, UPS, FedEx, Pfizer, Intel, and Symantec. The Shannon Free Zone is technically an asset of Shannon Development.
Duty-free exemptions are available also to companies operating in Ireland's major deep-water port at Ringaskiddy in County Cork, although these have been used infrequently in recent years.
Foreign Direct Investment Statistics
According to Ireland's Central Statistical Office (CSO), the stock of FDI in Ireland for end-year 2006 stood at €118 billion, a €23 billion drop from 2005. (Note: The most recent FDI available from the CSO is 2006. In the past, CSO and U.S. Commerce Department figures for U.S. FDI in Ireland have differed, due to different calculation methods.)
During 2008, IDA Ireland negotiated 130 new business projects with new and existing clients, which involved a total investment commitment of €2 billion over the coming years and 8800 new jobs. The average salary of jobs at these new investments was in excess of €45,000. IDA Ireland announced 84 new and expansion projects with U.S. companies during 2008.
Major U.S. Investments in Ireland
|Bausch & Lomb||Waterford|
|Boston Scientific||Galway, Cork, Wexford|
|Bristol Myers Squib||Limerick, Dublin|
|HP-Compaq Computers||Galway, Dublin|
|Conoco Phillips||Whitegate, Midleton, Co. Cork|
|Dell Computers||Limerick, Dublin|
|Eastman Kodak||Limerick, Cork|
|Intel Ireland||Dublin, Leixlip|
|Johnson & Johnson||Dublin|
|Millipore Ireland BV||Cork|
|Prudential Insurance of America||Letterkenny|